IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-geojson-03

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 27 May 2016 07:05 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A91C12D5D1; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s6GGIiA4gFHM; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4C1612D519; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id x7so73703090qkd.3; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=C3EZ1FMXoRbcNAuw6sFswlfEt2LeuskTwmADryK3fmM=; b=UIth/duNqzuqlIjAUggnU458/QVMZvaZn7uWoXWgMe0XH4j3c+Nqk3i2zxFHnUADOo d8ox1RL7IcxTvvXgUIfHJolKj3Lwe/e6lx8+qvInIo9TO1jg57cqYiIAsZUVJntL9NIS k/9vErP8lm6yyiKG0SSUrU2v633pEecHd6X8DvPeHzV/DYQZz9zZ4kU+xcVOj9a49NoX lANYsqT2670+4V8TDWyKgbz9wowD29Z7VHLadYpWltjA+jtPumPUvo+fWR+U4LTMLNSF Yu9q5Jphy/0r9gRI11hTjZArN8ECFkVK/JQgf8mGwdnFAJZve23jBxZ/VWyfuC9tZjeI rPQA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=C3EZ1FMXoRbcNAuw6sFswlfEt2LeuskTwmADryK3fmM=; b=gNvJ7y+EEMZ2nKlKW5RzB+VewJDigAujIoYrYwPggWMv8CnmMZVDhGObFTSfDDuqv2 Mk+o3IJvTA6BXg1V6AcG3tTVvoiUDGFQIUwkE0Dutdo56pgoTktQtDha8uzW2ryvF8m6 IoqHBLt9i0/L9hvWagudYqkJVsbfNNpEA907h6MTHr/5t45T20OMBc2b0aEfSuKnt0cn vAhW4MGrqllOiJsOCStIBjqrWw9Yd/SEymAJZzprWrwkOWir4NaDDuZTt8hWz5v2fu7t mXkcwLHqrXbQO3pMqaFqyDqXk3vOIFNtPxbU+bCqJ/fum7Lal+JxMdXerPb7F8xeHScH fq0g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKbKPS44aYx3nXw2tHKWAJvzFUmAjVZQAWU+BpJA5k0ctjhCH9BvWATnHjgfwRtAKCM8LXxpU3shzAVCA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.237.42.194 with SMTP id t60mr4321993qtd.40.1464332703045; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.104.70 with HTTP; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2f7b562b-3455-3518-c933-12aeb6a3957a@gmail.com>
References: <2f7b562b-3455-3518-c933-12aeb6a3957a@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 17:05:02 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUViwb8n2yqC-DSmYKHQDB3yn3h_NRDK2m2qWjQ+Awtpw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/GhwBsFPZi8G5VjejHllUY7hZs_o>
Cc: draft-ietf-geojson.all@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-geojson-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:05:06 -0000

On 26 May 2016 at 16:15, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote:
> This document describes a JSON format for representing geospatial
> data.  It recommends a single coordinate reference system and does
> not appear to be readily extensible to other coordinate reference
> systems, but I'll assume that this has been addressed and resolved
> by the responsible AD, etc. if it's actually a problem.

This was discussed - extensively - by the working group.  The lack of
specific extensions for CRS is a deliberate decision.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email