Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Fri, 14 February 2014 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F671A0345 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:14:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A2UBVLXvIH-P for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:14:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp122.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp122.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5224E1A02CF for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:14:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp8.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B1CD11A013E; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:14:46 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp8.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id 42D5E1A0107; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:14:45 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EC78EBE6-7F7B-41C2-941D-46FD2DD081DE"
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Priority: 4 (Low)
In-Reply-To: <52E93A6B.9020400@gondrom.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:14:45 -0500
Message-Id: <19D1C94B-B284-45D6-AFDE-A1781B633F72@ogud.com>
References: <52101187.2060409@gondrom.org> <5293E22B.90705@gondrom.org> <52E93A6B.9020400@gondrom.org>
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/GxOvMw0XXzf2n0MhLnpcqf1Seas
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms.all@tools.ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:14:53 -0000

Thanks Tobias for the review 

On Jan 29, 2014, at 12:29 PM, Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> wrote:

> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> 
> The document is basically just about acronyms to simplify DANE conversations 
> The document appears ready for publication. 
> 
> The security consideration section is sufficient and there are no security issues with this document. 
> 
> There are only two small nits / spelling issues: 
> in section "Abstract":
> - s/Experience has show that/Experience has shown that

Fixed
> - speaking of acronyms, the first mention of TLSA should spell it out. 

I added: 
(TLSA is not an acronym but a name )

> Thank you and best regards. 
> 
> Tobias

Hope this addresses your concerns

	Olafur