[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-6lo-ghc-03 [no problem]

Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> Sat, 30 August 2014 08:58 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1041A88E6; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 01:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.439
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HZTr9Tir626y; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 01:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e-mailfilter01.sunet.se (e-mailfilter01.sunet.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:8:2::201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41C551A88DF; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 01:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.sunet.se (smtp1.sunet.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:8:2::214]) by e-mailfilter01.sunet.se (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id s7U8vxaG026239 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:57:59 +0200
Received: from kerio.sunet.se (kerio.sunet.se [192.36.171.210]) by smtp1.sunet.se (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s7U8vu1Z029545 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:57:59 +0200 (CEST)
X-Footer: c3VuZXQuc2U=
Received: from [172.20.10.3] ([2.65.35.220]) (authenticated user leifj@sunet.se) by kerio.sunet.se (Kerio Connect 8.2.4) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:57:56 +0200
Message-ID: <54019213.9000800@sunet.se>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:57:55 +0200
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-6lo-ghc.all@tools.ietf.org, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: outbound, outbound-sunet-se:default, sunet-se:default, base:default, @@RPTN)
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=192.36.171.210; country=SE; latitude=62.0000; longitude=15.0000; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=62.0000,15.0000&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound-sunet-se:outbound (inherits from outbound-sunet-se:default, sunet-se:default, base:default)
X-Canit-Stats-ID: 09MIUVXqX - de98ed774959 - 20140830
X-CanIt-Archive-Cluster: PfMRe/vJWMiXwM2YIH5BVExnUnw
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/HEBG58u3Ky2idU7v9JT3TBlHmCY
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-6lo-ghc-03 [no problem]
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 08:58:04 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
 These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.

I'm not a subject-matter expert of compression or ipv6 but I can't find
any issues with this draft. It seems ready for publication.