Re: [secdir] Secdir review for draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Thu, 14 February 2013 23:05 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFCC21F8777; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:05:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NTVZr4lnsWSq; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:05:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB2F21F8756; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:05:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=620; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1360883146; x=1362092746; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=PIUq4moKx6kBgTy4vKgFJL2rd2yfr9tMMAsULjPpYGY=; b=i2oHgTIEmuWLeCGoK+x1mgiH56BGTPz6X7nQ9DRJOoUY1BbmFfilmsm3 DhCTW/UyF+oBFmPqvnNqBOkuYxUMJ1YFtGKtLYMjWzPMbwaKWUpMyvMgZ cjOmlSRw7CoW4Do5O6voO52OylD0NR3Cd+3bNGE3MGF/A7PzAOQZxEpUh g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnYFABhtHVGtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABFhgK6VhZzgh8BAQEDATo/BQsCAQg2EDIlAgQOBYgMBr0ykSNhA5YkkFODBw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,666,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="177342332"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2013 23:05:46 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1EN5kG0026873 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:05:46 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.155]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:05:45 -0600
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: Secdir review for draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01
Thread-Index: AQHOCwSUjNgLuml/IE+aB1xikNSciph5+Zr7
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:05:45 +0000
Message-ID: <2CB59CA0-D253-42E9-BEFF-93F3BA673420@cisco.com>
References: <F1DFC16DCAA7D3468651A5A776D5796E06A110A0@SN2PRD0510MB372.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>, <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A815C59F00@dfweml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A815C59F00@dfweml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana@tools.ietf.org" <draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review for draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:05:48 -0000

Thanks Tina!

Thumb typed by Carlos Pignataro.
Excuze typofraphicak errows

On Feb 14, 2013, at 5:42 PM, "Tina TSOU" <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> This document looks good to me, ready for publication.
> 
> Thank you,
> Tina
>