Return-Path: X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D08D3A6B21 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:21:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.039 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.929, BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hlp71m5TvyJv for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:21:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp162.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp162.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.162]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748F93A6A6C for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:21:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp46.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9642FE87B7; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:24:51 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: from dynamic13.wm-web.iad.mlsrvr.com (dynamic13.wm-web.iad1a.rsapps.net [192.168.2.220]) by smtp46.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 795F0E86F7; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:24:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from hyperthought.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dynamic13.wm-web.iad.mlsrvr.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A36F3218001; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:24:51 -0500 (EST) Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: scott@hyperthought.com, from: scott@hyperthought.com) with HTTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:24:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:24:51 -0800 (PST) From: "Scott G. Kelly" To: "secdir@ietf.org" , "iesg@ietf.org" , draft-ymbk-splusp.all@tools.ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Type: plain Message-ID: <1295893491.433714482@192.168.4.58> X-Mailer: webmail8 Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ymbk-splusp X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Security Area Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:21:57 -0000 I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing= effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These co= mments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area director= s. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like an= y other last call comments.=0A=0AThis document describes a way to extend th= e IPv4 address space by reclaiming some of the TCP/UDP port bits for use as= address bits. The document is well written, and the security consideration= s seem complete. I see no security issues with this document.=0A=0A--Scott= =0A