Re: [secdir] Routing loop attacks using IPv6 tunnels

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Tue, 15 September 2009 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543753A6B48; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.982
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.982 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.617, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nFxLvJjK+F6M; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-smtpout-01.boeing.com (slb-smtpout-01.boeing.com [130.76.64.48]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2A43A6B57; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-av-01.boeing.com (slb-av-01.boeing.com [129.172.13.4]) by slb-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/8.14.0/SMTPOUT) with ESMTP id n8FFbaSf013805 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-av-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slb-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id n8FFbZ1u015468; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NWBH-11.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwbh-11.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.55.84]) by slb-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.0/8.14.0/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id n8FFbVBq015337; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.54.35]) by XCH-NWBH-11.nw.nos.boeing.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:37:35 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:37:34 -0700
Message-ID: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A10665CEC7@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <C6D56852.F4CD%hesham@elevatemobile.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Routing loop attacks using IPv6 tunnels
Thread-Index: AcozSBuZiYSXlZV3Qjy1t5j1F1+faQCCZNUwAB2xuaoAFEnBsA==
References: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A10665C90F@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <C6D56852.F4CD%hesham@elevatemobile.com>
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: "Hesham Soliman" <hesham@elevatemobile.com>, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Sep 2009 15:37:35.0485 (UTC) FILETIME=[72B2CAD0:01CA361A]
Cc: v6ops <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>, ipv6@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Routing loop attacks using IPv6 tunnels
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:37:10 -0000

Hesham,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hesham Soliman [mailto:hesham@elevatemobile.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 10:51 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L; Brian E Carpenter
> Cc: v6ops; Christian Huitema; ipv6@ietf.org; secdir@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Routing loop attacks using IPv6 tunnels
> 
> Fred,
> 
> >>> What I would rather have said was that mechanisms such as
> >>> SEcure Neighbor Discovery (SEND) may be helpful in private
> >>> addressing domains where spoofing is possible. Let me know
> >>> if this makes sense.
> >>
> >> Except for the practical problems involved in deploying SEND.
> >
> > Can it be said that there is any appreciable operational
> > experience with SEND yet? Are there implementations?
> 
> => About 2 months ago there was a thread on the node requirements
draft that
> addressed the presence of SEND implementations and people who have
> implementations voiced them on the list. If memory serves me right
it's
> basically on linux, BSD and IOS, but check the archives. I don't know
> anything about deployment experience.

Thanks for the pointer. A quick google search yesterday
also showed up JUNOS as having an implementation, so there
may be still others. I'll have a look at the archives.

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com
 
> Hesham