[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ethernet-addressing

Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Sat, 09 February 2013 06:28 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2DF21F841C for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 22:28:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -95.062
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.062 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3p0Fw1y1VOcC for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 22:28:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lvps176-28-13-69.dedicated.hosteurope.de (lvps176-28-13-69.dedicated.hosteurope.de [176.28.13.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BA021F8C93 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 22:28:38 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=Xbdge+bKLGkkPMv65/cVslxknrZeWNTPZqhXWehXTLzqv2HakX3eDB0iMb3ua+/dVM1PwevgB8TpcXzdeR/Zp2RxRSt8Oh3iBfuJNRAo2ekgd1KliDIp4GrwYAZ95PfY; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
Received: (qmail 3686 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2013 07:28:37 +0100
Received: from d1-162-57-143-118-on-nets.com (HELO ?10.8.18.138?) (118.143.57.162) by lvps176-28-13-69.dedicated.hosteurope.de with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 9 Feb 2013 07:28:37 +0100
Message-ID: <5115EC91.6010709@gondrom.org>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 14:28:33 +0800
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: secdir@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ethernet-addressing.all@tools.ietf.org
References: <50E2A5EB.7040706@gondrom.org>
In-Reply-To: <50E2A5EB.7040706@gondrom.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ethernet-addressing
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 06:28:39 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments ust like any other last call comments.

This ID is Standards Track, is about the link-layer addressing of
Ethernet frames carrying MPLS-TP packets.

The document is short and ok and the Security Consideration section does
discuss the potential issues sufficiently. I have no further comments.

Best regards, Tobias