Re: [secdir] Fwd: FW: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-template

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Wed, 30 January 2013 10:44 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF7C21F87D1 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:44:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.056, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y5UNIn6NKtKi for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:44:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA2921F87CC for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:44:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id j4so734037bkw.3 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:44:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iQn2KFljzwVENLNIV+F04/YZXccwgZ3V7nhlyhPwCxE=; b=ERtPVbbd+Im188c/p4vDMqSn0m6BrMaXWS6rXVAGHEq0Hmxj0skJWqa/4dga1Gh8EL KNjXsiiMWehYuLWA0sx4Wx46e5107kIMUC+lt0mYS/h2C5VIyDy4VwyGJdOMDqyL9RU6 GJVmVkk03CYAIgvCnhAW6WmV/XH6BmpdIKolJMWjL/gZQBI8N5TfRnGBXBQYtRgNfRn4 VE3rwwpSEkIxOhlbRGeYyuNgxYcwv0e+DwJ+3qQAgJysY+HO0kjhKHrVfoJM8IS8hamx vuOp+zl+7uaceYclun1+S4JbvomYdCtzzGu0zCPFOPVjROhenKfbC/vME9CrI7pLBdyK Px6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=iQn2KFljzwVENLNIV+F04/YZXccwgZ3V7nhlyhPwCxE=; b=FspnZhTSyoIcqzOSSq/T5XppUyoCvAfzv2Tx3ndMFw+CRE8U0BpKXLdGqAo3uKhq0F uGFai2tiPZVpxrPGO6F21Qj9ivXe2J4JGX9nz83Brs04aXiAXUSLpSDJ2urUui6KtV3A iKgpyoliqdL0TS2qAZwZyc7xtE6rxLSV2OioD+nC+TAciIvBzv6cPbB9SLzArYho3Boy We1Y1nht7E2WbLqsQsXMp4PkuUVS/ZYubVUTlhLqHCbqL1x1UGXde68oEAFVoLfxuJV2 6HxfuuBR5vN/HzjNbAYY2CGm/pBhnKd+a1K7tQAZ+sIkuPREgjt39gcV877FttRPRV33 /p1A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.204.129.70 with SMTP id n6mr1121781bks.60.1359542680215; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:44:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.38.198 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:44:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5108F774.20804@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <003e01cdfe4a$6af134c0$40d39e40$@olddog.co.uk> <510869C4.9060706@cs.tcd.ie> <CABrd9SSB9TFtKZVTjD3RXCYi5teno0rCT8R1T9fdywKA-w1FxQ@mail.gmail.com> <5108F629.2090306@cs.tcd.ie> <5108F774.20804@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:44:39 +0000
Message-ID: <CABrd9SSZdvUnSKVVZe2boymWmiaBi1fzu9SHEV4z8BgrUcMWxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk1DWyRSMbljUQ+wUUnut7DqXcIAFEaSiLMbIFXv2hNaWjlddV2Vatm1u3++5n5wQb/enoyMQKoYGqNFL2gZGcbyJCSOrXsKD1ej7nTXJyPetO7j0EZy5SxiKaZCXMmm5QeX1RH8dMzEkCPvAw5zyl+oyIHQ58yPSCDW4IzYfvGjzTCWxvUP/vq17W6YVW3JESJqSfc
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Fwd: FW: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-template
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:44:42 -0000

On 30 January 2013 10:35, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/30/2013 10:30 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> Ah, apologies for even asking if its that non-draft.
>> (I didn't look;-)
>>
>> I'll go back and beat 'em up if so.
>
> Sorry again. Now I remember.
>
> So this is really a template. Their plan is that they'll
> have a bunch of other RPL applicability statement
> drafts that say how to use the protocol in building
> control, etc. Each will use this template.
>
> Their question to us is what other things should those
> drafts be required (by this template) to say about
> security. So I guess we might say e.g. automated key
> management (BCP 107) needs to be well-defined and
> mandatory to implement.

I got that, but it seems impossible to answer without knowing a lot
more about ROLL than that doc says. Or RPL, whatever that is (not
defined in the doc).

>
> S.
>
>>
>> S.
>>
>> On 01/30/2013 10:00 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
>>> On 30 January 2013 00:31, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> The roll folks are looking for a review of this I-D.
>>>> If someone feels the love, can you let Tero know and
>>>> he'll capture that. If nobody does, then Tero, can
>>>> you pick whoever's next in the rotation.
>>>
>>> Do you mean https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-roll-applicability-template/?include_text=1?
>>> There doesn't appear to be a draft-ietf-
>>>
>>> If so, there's no info in it to base a security review on.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> S.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: FW: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-template
>>>> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:59:36 -0000
>>>> From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
>>>> Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
>>>> To: <turners@ieca.com>
>>>> CC: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>ie>, <roll-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
>>>>
>>>> Copying Sean in just in case he is inclined to say something.
>>>>
>>>> A
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: mcr@sandelman.ca [mailto:mcr@sandelman.ca] On Behalf Of Michael
>>>>> Richardson
>>>>> Sent: 27 January 2013 20:46
>>>>> To: stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie
>>>>> Cc: Adrian Farrel; jpv@cisco.com
>>>>> Subject: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-template
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm still looking for SEC Directorate review of the ROLL applicability
>>>>> template.
>>>>>
>>>>> The idea is to make sure that security question will get addressed
>>>>> earlier in the process, rather than at SEC Directorate review time.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
>>>>> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
>>>>> ]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> secdir mailing list
>>>> secdir@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
>>>> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> secdir mailing list
>> secdir@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
>> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>>
>>