Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-trill-address-flush-05

[Donald Eastlake <[e-mail]>]

Hi Dan,

Thanks for your review.

I've fixed the typo you noticed in the current source file so it should get
fixed the next time a revision is uploaded.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   [phone] (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 [e-mail]

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Dan Harkins <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>   Hello,
>
>   I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
> security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
> these comments just like any other last call comments.
>
>   This draft defines a new message to tell TRILL implementations to
> flush certain reachability information it has learned. It seems quite
> extensible and complete. The security considerations are adequate and
> discuss what would happen if these messages are not secured.
>
>   The draft is "Ready" for publication.
>
>   One editorial nit (to show I really did read it!): in section 2.2,
> "...where using a set of contiguous blocks if cumbersome." should be
> "is cumbersome" I think.
>
>   regards,
>
>   Dan.
>
>
>
>