Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane-04

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Tue, 14 December 2010 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39B43A6FA4; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:24:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.584
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.584 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JUYKXQij9q7F; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:24:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from monster.hopcount.ca (monster.hopcount.ca [216.235.14.38]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FBE3A6FA0; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:24:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [199.212.90.26] (helo=dh26.r1.owls.hopcount.ca) by monster.hopcount.ca with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <jabley@hopcount.ca>) id 1PSVtP-000Gdz-T2; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:30:17 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4D077C47.4010506@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:26:19 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5C11F4B2-00A9-4C5C-BA19-417756547632@hopcount.ca>
References: <001201cb9b59$acd02d70$06708850$@net> <DCC6725D-0C45-47BD-AC49-A38A256A75A8@hopcount.ca> <4D077C47.4010506@cisco.com>
To: rodunn@cisco.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 199.212.90.26
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jabley@hopcount.ca
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on monster.hopcount.ca); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:36:03 -0800
Cc: draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane@tools.ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, opsec-chairs@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-opsec-protect-control-plane-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:24:56 -0000

On 2010-12-14, at 09:16, Rodney Dunn wrote:

> Thanks Joe/Glen,
> 
> I made the updates to change them to 1812/1813 with a not to the reference to the 1645/1646 ports.
> 
> "Permit RADIUS authentication and accounting replies from RADIUS servers 198.51.100.9, 198.51.100.10, 2001:DB8:100::9, and 2001:DB8:100::10 that are listening on UDP ports 1812 and 1813. Note that this doesn't account for a server using the commonly deployed pre-standard UDP ports of 1812 and 1813."

I think you mean "1645 and 1646" in the final sentence.

I would also drop "commonly deployed" since I think the phrase is subjective and difficult to qualify, and replace "account for" with "accommodate" since one of the ports you're opening a hole for is for accounting and different uses of the same word seems worth avoiding (e.g. for non-English speakers).


Joe