Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16

Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org> Tue, 29 November 2016 14:11 UTC

Return-Path: <inacio@cert.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42321129AE0; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:11:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NpgYPz7haPif; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:11:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shetland.sei.cmu.edu (shetland.sei.cmu.edu [192.58.107.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CA05129670; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:11:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu (pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.22]) by shetland.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/1543) with ESMTP id uATEBi7i024454; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:11:44 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cert.org; s=jthatj15xw2j; t=1480428704; bh=hx+j0t1jbRUCBHMvyRPScbPGKJf8LxXHl5bSDyzQzfY=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To; b=Dwgbtdp6AvfCI2mV2kBtuUiXJsPhzyilu9BVjUVWojoSNwoBp5EXznzV0XARi+b/K V0wkAHPatqidiwUk8C++a/EcO++h5w7LlDzhk5iIpIvSDpaIyPrM3LPbQ2yw3vGmN/ 2FRTzKuONEXDvN2rpmEyWcsSPtt6BCSQnPw2Bs+g=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/1543) with ESMTP id uATEBfrw004144; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:11:42 -0500
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:11:41 -0500
From: Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Thread-Topic: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16
Thread-Index: AQHSRN51t+tWjKyq8EGqOIAmo07R6KDlrngAgAqwnAA=
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:11:39 +0000
Message-ID: <etPan.583d8c9b.26b686ea.2af@cert.org>
References: <2C424863-2993-4E7C-9B32-F35A5404422D@cert.org> <9141B17E-BB54-47EB-B6B2-D6D2BDFA8744@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <9141B17E-BB54-47EB-B6B2-D6D2BDFA8744@sn3rd.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.51.97]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_etPan583d8c9b26b686ea2afcertorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/JIUJOyVJro2Jz3vgZteEaP2s8ns>
Cc: "draft-ietf-side-bgpsec-algs.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-side-bgpsec-algs.all@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:11:48 -0000


From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com><mailto:sean@sn3rd.com>
Date: November 22, 2016 at 1:57:03 PM
To: Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org><mailto:inacio@cert.org>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org <secdir@ietf.org><mailto:secdir@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org <iesg@ietf.org><mailto:iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16.all@tools.ietf.org <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16.all@tools.ietf.org><mailto:draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject:  Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16


> On Nov 22, 2016, at 11:35, Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org> wrote:
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
>
> This document is: Ready with nits
>
> NIT: Section 3.1 Public Key Format
> "Section 2.1.1" links to the current document and not to RFC5480 in the initial reference.

Took me a bit to figure this out: You’re talking about the hmtl version right? I haven’t a clue why it’s doing that but I’ll make sure the final HTML version doesn’t do this (by asking the RFC editor to make sure it doesn’t happen ;).

spt


The draft was short enough that I reviewed it via just reading the tools.ietf.org site, so yes.  And, frankly, I only found it because I used one of the other links in the document to get to another RFC for background.  And I like your solution.  :)


--
Chris Inacio
inacio@cert.org<mailto:inacio@cert.org>