IETF Logo Mail Archive

[secdir] secdir lunch question

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 13 March 2012 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254ED21F8629 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.841
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.841 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.242, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eSDVlmwVzj7e for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.scss.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D59C21F8627 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9722171D8D for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:52:55 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:mime-version :user-agent:from:date:message-id:received:received: x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1331675575; bh=WwLVbKswamJlHiz+1/+1P+Yj 2JjNr+aaQTO3UdJxdPs=; b=lKpl7UaOkuiXzjSM64DjkXo5DQXQBC92kYRz/vWe P2jK3CN2JvwCymZtsE8qPw6PqMm5wdggoG9z5WDPte+R3IX+HT7sFP2HuTsarJQ/ RngecHuJC7iZAJf5GhmlChORzMgssTjWOZEVRT9sQgfgclimuY/v1G9raElpRPN9 ATuekx3u6KBRP10t9f9OZNaTH24mqznDVatn3X2dmzDnuOkBC/KMkkErrY808r7F HuDgXTwA+mbugj8Rd4NzDwhkC6RKyYYe5D0oFM9NHjkKjx4pLIGeam2djGAXm1q3 2/3Fy9QlulJxMY/dKqZhDFmQAz+WIQl6o4Bq4byKehREmg==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id RYy7PsNRt4Se for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:52:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.227.22.241] (unknown [194.230.159.113]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 886AB171D8C for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:52:54 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <4F5FC1B1.2090806@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:52:49 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [secdir] secdir lunch question
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:52:57 -0000

Hi all,

ISOC are organising an openid and oauth briefing session
in Paris that clashes with our usual secdir lunch session.
The clash is unfortunate but there's nothing to be done
about it now, since slots are so scarce.

So Sean and I wanted to check with you if you'd rather:

a) go ahead with the secdir lunch as usual
or
b) skip the secdir lunch this time to allow interested
folks to go to the ISOC gig.

Can you let Sean and I know which you prefer say by
Monday? (Off list is fine and I'll summarise or use the
list if you prefer.)

Thanks,
S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email