Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-04

[Ken Murchison <[e-mail]>]

On 2/10/21 8:18 AM, Ken Murchison wrote:
>
> Hi Valery,
>
> Thank you for the review.  Per your recommendation, I have added the 
> following phrase to the beginning of the Security Considerations section:
>
> "In addition to the security properties of iCalendar (see Section of 
> [RFC5545] 
> <https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi#RFC5545>), ..."
>
Copy and paste error above: this should say "Section 7 of"


> Is this sufficient, or do you have alternative text that you'd like to 
> see?
>
>
> On 2/10/21 7:44 AM, Valery Smyslov via Datatracker wrote:
>> Reviewer: Valery Smyslov
>> Review result: Ready
>>
>> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
>> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
>> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
>> Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
>> last call comments.
>>
>> The draft defines a set of extensions to the VALARM component of iCalendar.
>> The document is short and well written, its Security Considerations and Privacy Considerations
>> sections are sensible. I found the document ready.
>>
>> Nit: I would recommend adding a sentence to the Security Considerations section saying that
>> these VALARM extensions inherited security properties of iCalendar [RFC5545].
>>
>>
>>
> -- 
> Kenneth Murchison
> Senior Software Developer
> Fastmail US LLC

-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Senior Software Developer
Fastmail US LLC