Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01

"Tsao, Tzeta" <Tzeta.Tsao@cooperindustries.com> Tue, 12 March 2013 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=776cb6add=Tzeta.Tsao@cooperindustries.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9689211E80FB for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dRf-c-94DBeB for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cooperlighting-sw.cooperlighting.com (cooperlighting-sw.cooperlighting.com [216.130.131.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBD321F8AC1 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: cooperlighting-sw.cooperlighting.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,832,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="91680143"
Received: from cipt0174.nam.ci.root ([10.132.108.174]) by cooperlighting-sw.cooperlighting.com with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2013 14:19:56 -0400
Received: from EVS2.NAM.CI.ROOT ([10.132.108.170]) by cipt0174.NAM.CI.ROOT with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:19:56 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:19:54 -0400
Message-ID: <85A23E0910B2FB4B8EF60D0888CB0836026A7219@EVS2.nam.ci.root>
In-Reply-To: <11981.1363110482@sandelman.ca>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01
Thread-Index: Ac4fScTWinY+ziqHRUeu33Yof+OKXgAArgYA
References: <85A23E0910B2FB4B8EF60D0888CB083602658653@EVS2.nam.ci.root> <11981.1363110482@sandelman.ca>
From: "Tsao, Tzeta" <Tzeta.Tsao@cooperindustries.com>
To: "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2013 18:19:56.0028 (UTC) FILETIME=[32C933C0:01CE1F4E]
Cc: angel.lozano@upf.edu, vanesa.daza@upf.edu, secdir@ietf.org, jpv@cisco.com, "Alexander, Roger" <Roger.Alexander@cooperindustries.com>, mischa.dohler@cttc.es, adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:19:58 -0000

So far, the biggest structure change discussed is the removal of Section
6, even though that was a result of a lot of effort.

If that is where we want to go, let me take the first cut; will also see
what I can manage in that process in terms of Steve's comments. We can
then decide what exactly will need further attention.

Let me know if you see a different approach.

Thanks,
Tzeta 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mcr@sandelman.ca [mailto:mcr@sandelman.ca] On Behalf Of Michael
> Richardson
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 1:48 PM
> To: Tsao, Tzeta
> Cc: kent@bbn.com; secdir@ietf.org; angel.lozano@upf.edu;
> vanesa.daza@upf.edu; mischa.dohler@cttc.es; Alexander, Roger;
> jpv@cisco.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk
> Subject: Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01
> 
> 
> >>>>> "Tsao," == Tsao, Tzeta <Tzeta.Tsao@cooperindustries.com> writes:
>     Tsao> juncture, because of the reorientation of the focus of the
draft, it
>     Tsao> would seem better to wait out for more input from the WG
before
> starting
>     Tsao> to consider how to best address the questions raised in your
>     Tsao> comments.
> 
> If the WG is going to be able to provide you with more input, then we
need
> to take the comments and structure them into a series of discussions.
> The easiest way to do this is to turn them into issues in the tracker.
> 
> Again, would you like me to do this, or would you prefer to do this
yourself?
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/