Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01

["Tsao, Tzeta" <[e-mail]>]

So far, the biggest structure change discussed is the removal of Section
6, even though that was a result of a lot of effort.

If that is where we want to go, let me take the first cut; will also see
what I can manage in that process in terms of Steve's comments. We can
then decide what exactly will need further attention.

Let me know if you see a different approach.

Thanks,
Tzeta 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Michael
> Richardson
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 1:48 PM
> To: Tsao, Tzeta
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Alexander, Roger;
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01
> 
> 
> >>>>> "Tsao," == Tsao, Tzeta <[e-mail]> writes:
>     Tsao> juncture, because of the reorientation of the focus of the
draft, it
>     Tsao> would seem better to wait out for more input from the WG
before
> starting
>     Tsao> to consider how to best address the questions raised in your
>     Tsao> comments.
> 
> If the WG is going to be able to provide you with more input, then we
need
> to take the comments and structure them into a series of discussions.
> The easiest way to do this is to turn them into issues in the tracker.
> 
> Again, would you like me to do this, or would you prefer to do this
yourself?
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Sandelman Software Works
> IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/