Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint-04

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Thu, 02 September 2021 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222D53A191A; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iki.fi
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ov2ooNJWbJye; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from meesny.iki.fi (meesny.iki.fi [IPv6:2001:67c:2b0:1c1::201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A3E13A191D; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fireball.acr.fi (fireball.acr.fi [83.145.195.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kivinen@iki.fi) by meesny.iki.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90A89203CF; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 20:41:23 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iki.fi; s=meesny; t=1630604483; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JVfUtrR4Ks2e+YUKa+cmQogqv7/keHoTOWq/qikOvyk=; b=jAJqm6XWSLCqOyV8i0yu9j0cQxHDd4fNbc0hmtydIiiuKRO/bGRtlzdNgHay6wJM/Cq5L0 WWYSfOU6XoReolnfZpv2f+bHJ2hHJWlSTCxaG9jBUADH+mg9FAPL5b4UuytN1r0kt4mgFK t/hf2MkokRhbGS+sX7A76l2DtMgjx1I=
Received: by fireball.acr.fi (Postfix, from userid 15204) id 9168725C12B7; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 20:40:51 +0300 (EEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <24881.3235.541861.281100@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 20:40:51 +0300
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: "Nagendra Kumar Nainar \(naikumar\)" <naikumar@cisco.com>
Cc: "secdir\@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint.all\@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint.all@ietf.org>, "last-call\@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "mpls\@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <BL3PR11MB5732FB445DEA2A1F9A1923E2C6CE9@BL3PR11MB5732.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <162333482591.8235.4418205938937483332@ietfa.amsl.com> <BL3PR11MB5732F1592884274961E7B268C6CC9@BL3PR11MB5732.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <24880.46160.502738.363907@fireball.acr.fi> <BL3PR11MB5732FB445DEA2A1F9A1923E2C6CE9@BL3PR11MB5732.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 26.3 (x86_64--netbsd)
X-Edit-Time: 4 min
X-Total-Time: 3 min
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=meesny; d=iki.fi; t=1630604483; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=y4aG8FKrnOnKMA07hs/k9oDpaNneMFBVYqhWFDRq+wzRrqyEJeuFtDh5JPxH8nT+8Sm540 P3CYNc4+iSZkigDpJjCFrUcxwFf6tL/xZhh08/FZuAcx1+aCzAO4jh5ciHgSwxRmOew1Lk sTDnkbno98T8x+M65Cv/R5znl8XrQXg=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=kivinen@iki.fi smtp.mailfrom=kivinen@iki.fi
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iki.fi; s=meesny; t=1630604483; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JVfUtrR4Ks2e+YUKa+cmQogqv7/keHoTOWq/qikOvyk=; b=PUxksXZpn+weGfjds0Zxj5z0vBGcrcseTsvEKz7lJj5OLXMl29QXe8rGG5QIFXutujfc50 gyLtRyXFw5jHwCynJlUDycavTLJqQAJUJrxxuV2yiVrzpfCf62fB+XhVZ2aY56OMBBTWFL peIRQ5tTgtaKsxKgQ+I+ORZWf0dznWY=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/LkxjOIYFljebv3_oFwWvk_SH_G0>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 17:41:45 -0000

Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar) writes:
> I understand it is much harder
> to get rid of that in the actual discussions in the session etc, but
> at least here in the RFCs we can make it easier for new people to read
> the drafts when they do not need to be doing mappings between RFC
> numbers and the titles in their head, but can see both the number and
> name in the text.
> 
> <Nagendra> Some of these RFCs are referenced multiple times in the draft. Are
> you suggesting to have it in the first occurrence or in all the occurences?.

Yes, first reference is good enough. Of course repeating it few times
(i.e., once during the section 1 Introduction, and second time in
section x where the actual text is) does not hurt either.

Repeating it severals times inside same chapter is not really needed,
and might even be harmful. 
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi