IETF Logo Mail Archive

[secdir] Review of draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notificaiton-04

"Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com> Tue, 01 March 2016 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980E41B2F7E; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:20:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MmxH6BRy1rXZ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:20:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96E0A1B41D3; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:20:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2504; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1456867212; x=1458076812; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=i5VNnjTjHGAXoo9NXbFdt7hsmIVNRC2Uugn39gsnOFI=; b=mienrSclc7nGhP4jSe0krwzRUIT+W9Y/DdcEAWoS1y5tNKGAyIe/xqtH mTP+ONx7JEPxo6mMKeox/rhJ/31DV237IAOWhAHyJfeZ6NfJsObjJixXW zOVIgGcB21cF0Czy3A/OYVhsT4Q8ufUbH/99oyCtbf2bwnpGvDrKqkqRq 8=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 496
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AqAwAyBtZW/5BdJa1cgzpSbQEFui0OgWYhgjyDNoFQOBQBAQEBAQEBZCeESIELARxkJwQBIIgRDr4fAQEBAQEBBAEBAQEBAQERCId+gk6EVYMLgQ8FknWEGQGBGoFugWRsiAmBYEuDeYhSjksBHgFDg2Rrh0IBfQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,524,1449532800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="76642620"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Mar 2016 21:20:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u21LKBoP023356 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 21:20:11 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 15:20:10 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 15:20:10 -0600
From: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
To: "draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification.all@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notificaiton-04
Thread-Index: AQHRdAAjr6g+Q/FgyEGL9pH6QLQVnw==
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 21:20:10 +0000
Message-ID: <BE1B519D-1BD0-4AC4-B8B7-8B4C59B642EF@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-pgp-agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [64.101.72.38]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6C0E9EC5-725C-4B87-9ED5-389D50623BCE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/LmPa-4NzYKKr0N2hZoHjyDOSlTs>
Subject: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notificaiton-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 21:20:15 -0000

I am the coincidentally-assigned Gen-ART and SecDir reviewer
for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF
documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  The Security
Directorate reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
the security area directors.  Please treat these comments just like any
other last call comments that arrived on time.

For more information on Gen-Art, please see the FAQ at

< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq >.

Document: draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification-04
Reviewer: Matthew Miller
Review Date: 2016-02-26
IETF LC End Date: 2016-02-26
IESG Telechat date: N/A

Summary:

Ready with a minor issue.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

* I didn't see any discussion of the case where the RTP extension and the RTCP message don't agree on the interval.  Well-behaved software shouldn't do this, but it seems like something that could happen.  I'm not sure what should be done in this case, but it seems to me like something to at least acknowledge it.

Nits/editorial comments:

* idnits is reporting a bad reference to "3711" Section 7 "Security Considerations", and that RFC 3711 is an unused normative reference.  I think this is because the pointer to it in Section 7 doesn't start with "RFC".

* In Section 1. "Introduction", it seems to me "However" would be a better word than "Nevertheless" to use here.


--
- m&m

Matt Miller
Cisco Systems, Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email