[secdir] Review of draft-ietf-grow-mrt-add-paths-03
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 13 February 2017 21:29 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9384129959; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:29:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.43.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148702134865.24993.7015216971422780095.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:29:08 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/LsHcLDicIGMbPgUFEhFhT7g5JkQ>
Cc: draft-ietf-grow-mrt-add-paths.all@ietf.org, grow@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-grow-mrt-add-paths-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:29:09 -0000
Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Document : draft-ietf-grow-mrt-add-paths-03 Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard This document simply carries an extension to BGP forward into this routing information export format. It notes in its security consideration section that including the information the BGP extension allows to be conveyed increases the detail of the network path information exposed to any recipient (intended or otherwise). I agree that it adds no further new security considerations.
- [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-grow-mrt-add-paths-… Robert Sparks