Re: [secdir] Gen-ART / SecDir Review of draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification-07

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 02 June 2016 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B017512D511; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 07:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3lULCY3JF6Ji; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 07:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13CFA12D1CD; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 07:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.1.4] ([162.216.46.192]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u52EuBQn098480 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Jun 2016 09:56:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [162.216.46.192] claimed to be [10.10.1.4]
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "Matt Miller" <mamille2@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:56:10 -0400
Message-ID: <A6A462B3-6AEC-4F62-BEFE-FCC89F7FCB9C@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <850F2C19-92CD-48AC-B88B-6C89E136786C@cisco.com>
References: <850F2C19-92CD-48AC-B88B-6C89E136786C@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/LucIIUeaQhd3VmAd5ZRyI0V3kaw>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification.all@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Gen-ART / SecDir Review of draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:56:19 -0000


On 2 Jun 2016, at 10:23, Matt Miller (mamille2) wrote:

> I am the coincidentally-assigned Gen-ART and SecDir reviewer
> for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all 
> IETF
> documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  The 
> Security
> Directorate reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
> the security area directors.  Please treat these comments just like 
> any
> other last call comments that arrived on time.
>
> For more information on Gen-Art, please see the FAQ at
>
> < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq >.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-notification-07
> Reviewer: Matthew A. Miller
> Review Date: 2016-06-02
> IETF LC End Date: 2016-06-01
> IESG Telechat date: N/A
>
> Summary:
>
> This document is ready to be published as a Proposed Standard
> once the nit is taken care of.
>
> I reviewed a previous revision of this document (-04), and all of my
> concerns from the earlier review are addressed herein.
>
> I note this document includes normative references to two 
> Informational
> documents (RFCs 7201 and 7667).  The references are important to
> properly understand some of the security considerations of this
> document, but it appears the responsible AD is to add them to the
> approved downrefs registry.

Just an observation: we did do a second IETF last call for to the 
normative downrefs.

[...]

Thanks!

Ben.