Re: [secdir] secdir lunch question

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 22 March 2012 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5364221F852E for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K0Bwf0dJJXI4 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.scss.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEBF21F866A for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A0B153B52 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:00:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1332428418; bh=/vFcgNZm/U8bxu vYyJJXC2bCQ8kuUW+SueLBnzI40O0=; b=A11SSlnfOiuyID4fk2RXow1sNQc+bA BC4S3ONVl4yLG+y3udI04LDxx6r7g4IA5kyM4RBYamgqAziKRMe2eeDU8kqtCbVG jepAYMS2cF1K68w+r4tMZzo6Epu9xuIFN/o4V2nszxzfpJ7pfMXeBF4iDxNuDqfW OmgfYi1IcPAp7OqTZF69MvwIul+p48Y2fzQlXtd1a6Zd/i9JYJ9VjFFNK0TDY+7X bhQmgvciQsPcumkKiCkZs8oeoLxHq0/ST0zlJ9dJSEDzH3jVPkZRAwKcLHexq4/a Yf3/kkht031keeoAE44NUiQ9gXib6Co2o1+n/KoEQ6YI02uCpPWUDljw==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id X3ysW7gOqlrM for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:00:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.5] (unknown [86.45.51.117]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FBFF153B51 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:00:18 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <4F6B3E81.7070303@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:00:17 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
References: <4F5FC1B1.2090806@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <4F5FC1B1.2090806@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir lunch question
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:01:33 -0000

Hiya,

Sorry for being slow getting back to this, it got lost (in
my head) when travelling last week.

Summary of the responses I've seen on and off list included
is:

- find another time please (1)
- (a) secdir lunch anyway (4)
- (b) skip secdir this time, go to ISOC gig (4.5)
- have both (0.5)
- no opinion (dunno why we got a mail then;-) (1)
- will go to secdir if on, otherwise ISOC (2)
- whichever has beer (1, no it wasn't me:-)

Having seen that, Sean wisely suggested we go for
a possibly smaller secdir lunch crowd this time and
I'll ask for 10 seats to be reserved for secdir folks
at the ISOC gig. Please let me know if you need one.

So, secdir lunch will be on (room tbd) and some of
us will skip that to check out the ISOC thingy this
time.

S.


On 03/13/2012 09:52 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> ISOC are organising an openid and oauth briefing session
> in Paris that clashes with our usual secdir lunch session.
> The clash is unfortunate but there's nothing to be done
> about it now, since slots are so scarce.
>
> So Sean and I wanted to check with you if you'd rather:
>
> a) go ahead with the secdir lunch as usual
> or
> b) skip the secdir lunch this time to allow interested
> folks to go to the ISOC gig.
>
> Can you let Sean and I know which you prefer say by
> Monday? (Off list is fine and I'll summarise or use the
> list if you prefer.)
>
> Thanks,
> S.
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>