Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-bfd-on-lans

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 05 December 2013 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CA91ADBD4; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 01:57:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eZpkDEeleQQ4; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 01:57:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7261ACC7D; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 01:57:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36F2BE9A; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:57:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uRHkRIMiMLo1; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:57:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89F04BE8B; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:57:20 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <52A04E01.500@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 09:57:21 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, 'Sam Hartman' <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, secdir@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
References: <tsl1u1s5qg8.fsf@mit.edu> <11f901cef13f$35ac21b0$a1046510$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <11f901cef13f$35ac21b0$a1046510$@olddog.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: draft-ietf-bfd-on-lans@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-bfd-on-lans
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 09:57:27 -0000

On 12/04/2013 10:21 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Thanks Sam, and sorry to disappoint you.
> 
> Your quote is going in my Twitter file...
> 
>> If the universe valued good abstraction layers, entire civilizations
>> would crumble in disgust every time you send one of these packets.
>> However, it is a useful hack for performance and code re-use.

That is good:-)

S.

> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>