[secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-14
Chris Lonvick via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 29 June 2021 22:30 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162163A1550; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Chris Lonvick via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: bess@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.33.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <162500581702.14479.10740784349692238870@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:30:17 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/MpfHlAz25yLpmXGuhUWZxQiFODg>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-14
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 22:30:17 -0000
Reviewer: Chris Lonvick Review result: Ready Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is READY. This is a re-review. The Security Considerations section has been updated and addresses the issues I noted from the version -09 I previously reviewed. The additions to the section do a very good job of addressing the adherence to or differences from the security considerations sections of the referenced RFCs. Regards, Chris
- [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bes… Chris Lonvick via Datatracker
- Re: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf… Benjamin Kaduk