Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami-12

[Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>]

Chris Lonvick <[e-mail]> wrote:
    > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
    > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
    > IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
    > security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
    > these comments just like any other last call comments.

Chris thank you for this.

    > Overall, the document looks great. This is a very information-dense
    > document and the authors and contributors have done a wonderful job of
    > putting it together. While I do not follow the technology, I was able
    > to understand the concepts and I could see that the security
    > considerations were appropriate.

    > Some very small nits that the authors may want to consider:
    > - the terms DODAG, DIO, and DAO are not expanded anywhere. (Yeah, I
    > know I could go look them up... ;-)

They are common terms from RFC6550 which is our core document.
Would it work to say that they are from RFC6550 and rfc7102?

    > - The 2nd paragraph in 9.3 ends with "Known schemes". I figure someone
    > was going to write something more there.

seems like an edit error. Nancy?


--
Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG outgoing co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/