[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-08
Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com> Thu, 20 June 2013 23:37 UTC
Return-Path: <bew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B5121F9FC1; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11sU8Pgq6yKh; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40E121F9F9E; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=274; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1371771461; x=1372981061; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: cc:to:mime-version; bh=szs+HqFFlrmtCzuxn9KUGpJ9ILSRWnQ/l7XpoG0+gl8=; b=Ia7SzyIs6GG1BITGSIMj6AeOL1t4bFkB0pEQ6778zfKBBMW3nOFAcT5X YCRRnhKWJ5aJ+OgQ0fpCh/CEpy2Ukz1vPkRE1nIxZBS4loEa7jat2JDLn RCnsb9pIqy29/l+X+aT9knLQc374onLPP/Y0sjEJLSTlN2Gxypu3EpxaA 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFALyRw1GrRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABbgwnAMIEAFnSCZD+BPgGIHwG8Oo9JgwdhA4khjiKRRIMv
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,908,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="83952174"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Jun 2013 23:37:40 +0000
Received: from dhcp-128-107-147-81.cisco.com (dhcp-128-107-147-81.cisco.com [128.107.147.81]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r5KNbdoj014343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 23:37:39 GMT
From: Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:37:38 -0700
Message-Id: <712268AC-15B4-416D-82AD-5C835299E5C8@cisco.com>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: "draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-08
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 23:37:46 -0000
I had previously done a Secdir review of draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-06 and had a few minor suggestions. They have been incorporated into draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-08, and believe it ready to be published as a Standards Track RFC. Brian