[secdir] Sector last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-07

Russ Mundy <mundy@tislabs.com> Thu, 14 December 2017 00:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mundy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E8A12421A; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:14:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BU8i4DGxURgX; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:14:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5277512025C; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:14:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A247328B0041; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:14:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nova.tislabs.com [10.66.1.77]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D05B1F8036; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:14:40 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Russ Mundy <mundy@tislabs.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:14:40 -0500
Cc: Russ Mundy <mundy@tislabs.com>, draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 534903280.073597-914442e256146cc4c729ea771be1822f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D65E13ED-77FF-45E9-8EAB-BFDB3CEA6CA2@tislabs.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Nu7UtFJscLiFK8gLqaYRzi-2D1s>
Subject: [secdir] Sector last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:14:45 -0000

Reviewer: Russ Mundy
Review result: Ready

Hi, 

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready

As with a number of ID’s, there is a significant amount of referencing of other RFCs/IDs - so much so, that it is difficult to get a clear understanding of what is being specified in the document itself (the diagrams are very useful - well done). However, since this ID has an intended status of Informational, the amount of referencing is probably acceptable but I would recommend that at least RFC4272 be included in the Informative References list.


Russ