Re: [secdir] Feedback about secdir reviews
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 26 March 2012 11:49 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F223021F85B1 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 04:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HS18FFBMT27r for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 04:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF56521F8691 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 04:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-2121.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-2121.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.33.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2QBnVb0070416 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 04:49:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CB95F0C8.20130%ietfdbh@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:49:36 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D89C947A-181F-4AA7-8A0A-6169924C98F2@vpnc.org>
References: <CB95F0C8.20130%ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Feedback about secdir reviews
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:49:44 -0000
On Mar 26, 2012, at 5:01 PM, David Harrington wrote: > The authors of raqmon got a review that said they had issues to consider. > It took something like eight months (IIRC) for them to learn about and > consider each issue and determine that the problems cited in the review > really didn't exist for their protocol spec. > That leaves a pretty bad taste in people's mouths. That happened over five years ago; maybe those people would believe that the SecDir processes have changed since. --Paul Hoffman
- [secdir] Feedback about secdir reviews Stephen Farrell
- Re: [secdir] Feedback about secdir reviews David Harrington
- Re: [secdir] Feedback about secdir reviews Paul Hoffman