Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-martini-gin-10.txt
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 17 November 2010 13:37 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7733A68FF; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 05:37:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.743
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.743 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Shi8JLbnMKN; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 05:37:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE26F3A68F3; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 05:37:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hydra-3.local (99-152-144-32.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.144.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAHDcAUQ038923 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:38:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4CE3DAC2.3080505@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:38:10 -0600
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikZva3c=D0tRKg-g3QsCoB-PpcSDUzsmYfJCqrU@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikZva3c=D0tRKg-g3QsCoB-PpcSDUzsmYfJCqrU@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 99.152.144.32 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 05:45:21 -0800
Cc: draft-ietf-martini-gin.all@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-martini-gin-10.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:37:29 -0000
Radia: Thanks for the review! One quick comment. On 11/16/10 23:16, Nov 16, Radia Perlman wrote: > 1) Page 3 para 2 line 3: "users" -> "user's" The sentence begins: "The users registered individual reachability information with this authority..." In this case, we are talking about a class of users (plural, not possessive) who registered (past-tense verb, not adjective) information. The construction is a bit awkward, and I can see how you would read it differently than intended. I'll see what I can do to make it less confusing; perhaps "The users would register..." /a
- Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-martini-… Adam Roach
- [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-martini-gin-… Radia Perlman