Re: [secdir] Early SecDir Reviews

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sat, 02 January 2016 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194021A6F97 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 13:32:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gAN5hPgEcxvy for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 13:32:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (x-bolt-wan.smeinc.net [209.135.219.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019E01A6F99 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 13:32:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB3F9A4020; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 16:32:51 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vm6jgm6PjQ0Z; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 16:31:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.2.104] (pool-108-51-128-219.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.128.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2179A4017; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 16:32:50 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-23-1016767621
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <00e901d14435$0d92b950$28b82bf0$@ndzh.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 16:32:49 -0500
Message-Id: <F250E2F7-4CA0-4446-96FE-14BD915E1BD8@vigilsec.com>
References: <00e901d14435$0d92b950$28b82bf0$@ndzh.com>
To: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/OfM5evXCqHyRnQaPhQ879cp4JBA>
Cc: 'Kathleen Moriarty' <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Early SecDir Reviews
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 21:32:54 -0000

Sue:

I believe that my comments have been addresses.

I still see a great deal of overlap between Section 2.4 and requirements SEC-REQ-09.

Russ


On Dec 31, 2015, at 8:37 PM, Susan Hares wrote:

> Russ:
>  
> Just checking to see that all the issues you raised in for draft-hares-i2rs-auth-trans on the SEC-DIR list:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05964.html
>  
> are answered in WG version of this draft: draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements-01
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements/
>  
> I’m ready to send this to the IESG for publication, but in checking on the SEC-DIR list,
> I did not see an OK.
>  
> Thank you for all your help to improve this draft on I2RS protocol security.
>  
> Sue Hares  
>