Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06

Jordi Palet Martínez <jordi.palet@theipv6company.com> Wed, 26 June 2019 08:58 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1080c7f748=jordi.palet@theipv6company.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E248D120251; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 01:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=theipv6company.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dOpBEO0u42W4; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 01:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A1B12022E; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 01:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=theipv6company.com; s=MDaemon; t=1561539510; x=1562144310; i=jordi.palet@theipv6company.com; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=0Uxb113s xFZi/YhVlAwLAw49O1nZR2/53ftjiI0t4OE=; b=p2r6LSreVU2eP1zRL4a1yaVb 0hWU30SHR0N2/y/ZPw+o0VOXZGXSUGqPLRojYn8L0OJ/SevjudvlGQ4JFXFHqtze 0MyirYm6puqACZsA52a48ak//nnp4PQ7fvUNP6RNymVgwlFtbxa5SUKWlQIrXbJk uOLiz1fj9MXsErIXeZM=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: consulintel.es, Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:58:30 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: consulintel.es, Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:58:30 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.139] by consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50006307373.msg; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:58:29 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:21d1:fd8f:d52a:2bc5
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.139]
X-MDArrival-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:58:29 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@theipv6company.com
X-Return-Path: prvs=1080c7f748=jordi.palet@theipv6company.com
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@theipv6company.com
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.b.190609
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:58:26 +0200
From: Jordi Palet Martínez <jordi.palet@theipv6company.com>
To: Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment.all@ietf.org
Message-ID: <B5D4024A-46CE-46B9-B80A-1ED6AA271A96@theipv6company.com>
Thread-Topic: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06
References: <a04deb97-6d41-1f46-3356-35ef39200dd9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a04deb97-6d41-1f46-3356-35ef39200dd9@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Ok69cRkr4hi_7UIdQHJpwDp0i5o>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-06
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:58:36 -0000

Hi Chris,

Thanks a lot for your review!

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 

El 25/6/19 3:04, "Chris Lonvick" <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com> escribió:

    Hi,
    
    I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
    ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. 
    These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security 
    area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these 
    comments just like any other last call comments.
    
    The summary of the review is READY.
    
    I mostly skimmed this informational document. It appears to be well laid 
    out and complete. The Security Considerations section is succinct and 
    offers, "This document does not have new specific security 
    considerations beyond those already reported by each of the documents 
    cited." I believe that is sufficient for this document.
    
    Regards,
    Chris
    
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.