IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-07

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Thu, 17 December 2015 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476411B2E8F; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 07:08:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60ZK96txmXDR; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 07:08:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0765.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:765]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA4B81B2E8E; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 07:08:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Lt24yXXTjjYbbqPs+ffYEy7esdb9kTHrTXbmw+4/U+U=; b=kGzq+/M3iDZmn05l1QiRMPtZHnES/6owYvAniPti6pLifCDrxy969zMFu513QEegYRt+cQVSjf+1Ep1EOUt9MiZufh6cPrkczQfDIfia/dpDmBSIhAxut+p6tjk1mXXggKmY9eQI68aiU05U/IRvhNO3fS/+izfrxcxfz8kvP5w=
Received: from BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.145) by BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.355.16; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:07:51 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.145]) by BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0355.012; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:07:51 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession.all@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-07
Thread-Index: AQHRMuXgTHsfTzeZLUSeMZWHhPgFsp7PUl8Q
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:07:51 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR03MB4428E623465D45CB5C48DBAF5E00@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <56677FD4.4070201@gmail.com> <5668CE21.1030700@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5668CE21.1030700@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [93.216.71.75]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR03MB442; 5:xHXWu9kSoGP4Lr4iW8ZEZHhR2zP3K0AWdGYSxTvQNGeTfbEkQ8fxLbvWAO9442r8JJteYaM9zha3qRtcyqZH5pYRgkU0L/4KWGX33/xLdRvZyhA/CQppPuR47AOeAelXfxY1S/aQ7uNEgipuhsSubA==; 24:fZ/glEc3RqtMXJEHHVQ1R5FlPuuO4IOvEUmbXwXDi/a830vVbhVe2a4LyQ3qUvBvibxtVrExFEiVmaKbB+byb6892QxGNpogEfaCw6iUx4c=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB442;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR03MB4424705A541690639BC7A67F5E00@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(520078)(10201501046)(3002001)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BY2PR03MB442; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR03MB442;
x-forefront-prvs: 07935ACF08
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(479174004)(189002)(199003)(13464003)(377454003)(24454002)(97736004)(5001770100001)(107886002)(5001960100002)(5002640100001)(189998001)(5003600100002)(11100500001)(106356001)(81156007)(6116002)(3846002)(54356999)(1096002)(102836003)(50986999)(76176999)(1220700001)(106116001)(76576001)(74316001)(5004730100002)(230783001)(10090500001)(105586002)(99286002)(10400500002)(8990500004)(10290500002)(5005710100001)(86612001)(66066001)(2201001)(86362001)(87936001)(101416001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(77096005)(586003)(2900100001)(5008740100001)(2501003)(33656002)(2950100001)(122556002)(92566002)(40100003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB442; H:BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Dec 2015 15:07:51.2733 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR03MB442
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/PWW3-Rco7v6CcWxUOpoMthkC_oM>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:08:12 -0000

Sorry for the slow response, Chris.  Your note had been auto-sorted into my Clutter folder where I didn't see it.  Stephen helpfully pointed out that he hadn't seen a response.  Responses inline below...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Lonvick [mailto:lonvick.ietf@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 1:58 AM
> To: iesg@ietf.org; secdir@ietf.org; draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession.all@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-07
>
> Shoot! I cut-n-pasted an incorrect email address yesterday. Resending to get this to the authors and everyone. Sorry for the dup's to some people.
> Best regards,
> Chris
>
> On 12/8/15 7:11 PM, Chris Lonvick wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 
> IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
> security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
> these comments just like any other last call comments.
>
> Overall, the document looks pretty good.
>
> I'd  recommend taking another look at the Security Considerations 
> section. It is sufficient and contains everything that I think needs 
> to be said. However, it may be a bit more clear if you separate the 
> security concerns of the protocol, from the security concerns of 
> credential management and policy. As I see it, the first and last 
> paragraphs are concerned with credentials and policy while the middle 
> paragraphs have statements about the actual protocol.

Fair enough.  I can group the security considerations items as you suggest.

> As a nit, I would suggest defining PoP at some point. While it's 
> pretty obvious, I just like the traditional use of defining it before 
> it's used.  :-)

I agree with this tradition. :-)

> Best regards,
> Chris

				Best wishes,
				-- Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email