Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-12
Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 20 March 2019 05:02 UTC
Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AAA130F62; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KoZZkKdVdeSz; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x12f.google.com (mail-it1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ABBA130F34; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id z126so26871605itd.5; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Lgj6IUrNgfq7IfzUjQlCuE8IfBp1syH0hDH0Mjo5lCQ=; b=A5B0thVWSm15ZnEDnBb+paLMNP0ciCLeuEqY5dTxE54S/gzCxDhFtSYHbfs6s0+mlo Zc9lIxylw/bIO2dWliN1Fxy3kB5nnWH8RVuDbaBEe0j6gJZdgL+o7YTKju7SB6o//OYV fsZE3WueyHUHL/0bRRfygxRasZBfMHSvmWfK/DDqskI/5VTyh9RSKhXoGqrQWkUYqay2 ex2Por0RQgoR+x+7t7Tum4r3XGxZI4jwbSem/CS001fF0SA+HtGn9A8We7hmSakIkdg1 XFPFPyeK2+YaW5ot0N1gTz/KmZDkpdL2Xn8WC8vig2eHWMryBcgEd1PGpkWU7+9KpQOM Vx0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Lgj6IUrNgfq7IfzUjQlCuE8IfBp1syH0hDH0Mjo5lCQ=; b=IRkjc2LnALcB1OH/FhaP0D7r5zFLVdQOk8V/lVD9QbwFtRcFgs4n033pE/8EcXScwH 75p7AIHXg82y8SwobjvbrDadM1+nDxrs2iYRNPKWcr5QMrEPv0BUe+ylH9mdAvkSvDbi 0dA8TSdagU8Lx/m1dCRctV65QUM4XyZ+aC1Shhs4iRPi+zHt2V+PjYRbDyMRJUpWN4M+ kWEVJwaXaVbsoKLqFPehh6J0KweXntqc6R1LfIBe/zVctngMaFeDbQAdxDxaS15AQjQj dD8MlxFd8nsrIvbobUj+i36PmWYBSq9n1jPSb0jXkcD20/InK1iwPbp35H9g37ifx9BE JMsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX1K8Oi/y6iklO9UkGUMaDhgH6ZUHvsMv0x2SuNq8LYbaJqSLdD Pt6Knx4mSQohEBUFruSe2JKTrKdXVBnUCFpUJNA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwOnhHp8gEmxj4w481XudUSqV/Z+P9cVe3Wcg6OE8SeOWDTiEnkoiP/S/hpjCNn23fCrW3x45qVWunPfQ+dIiU=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:978c:: with SMTP id k134mr3640963ite.67.1553058121663; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAF4+nEF+k8uv63+bw6_ERuK32NakynGQh14rY1WLLh_FxZAx=w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEF+k8uv63+bw6_ERuK32NakynGQh14rY1WLLh_FxZAx=w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:31:25 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn7VZi7qd3ESvzwx6+-LpQc2769+fHnYz+h_Yihi1BZnhw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Cc: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp.all@ietf.org, secdir <secdir@ietf.org>, pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a84d6505847f8563"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/PbUPc0YpMh6vPhC9_2LH1vK0ZWc>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-12
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 05:02:04 -0000
Hi Donald, Thanks for your review, updated in the working copy. Thanks! Dhruv On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 3:09 AM Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote: > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the > IESG. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > The summary of the review is Ready. > > Although the Security Considerations section is fairly short, it has > references to a number of relevant earlier RFCs that have quite > extensive Security Considerations sections. Furthermore PCEP was > previous extended to cover P2MP Traffic Engineered Label Switched > Paths and separately extended to be stateful. This draft's addition of > support for stateful P2MP TE LSPs is not that big of a change in > Security Considerations from those in the earlier RFCs. > > Editorial > > Section 3.2, Page 5, "are same as" -> "are the same as" > > Thanks, > Donald > =============================== > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA > d3e3e3@gmail.com >
- [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-pce-stat… Dhruv Dhody