[secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-08
Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Wed, 10 July 2024 16:51 UTC
Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97515C151701; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uir5pOUBM__3; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DC74C151087; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1fb1ff21748so36419535ad.3; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720630315; x=1721235115; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=RvLxMIH8VWlrCm7oKccrD18x1+0sU3MNzCW3JngzCo4=; b=LaJNx/sdXbyxBFuq0CVlGzDOokBFbkm+VlTjJID5jyqpYbxsf/kdnwjcJPbsz6d5Or PTifvCt+d/WnoLB9IwbZtwG1it9zS4B5UGfsToIS6A7mvBExfEtEfhfbIn5tbrkNkoH3 bpZ4rDkljWfCl7bL7MiKiU9jhKwOCnHoNzBlDyMo7hn1l/QgHrR1uhodXZs0RDle2Bra ga6P57HB/mHU+wtjLQJemfVoqRyKorvyg7eLkMNzcQdiPc2agglt2aLrjWObJXynzUNZ CFq/DUPkA7Sjf6mUCXnFPklmZ0PfrytB7U8TbApxEAkAl7iWF61sSlqWAo98tcDzCZgk K7bQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720630315; x=1721235115; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RvLxMIH8VWlrCm7oKccrD18x1+0sU3MNzCW3JngzCo4=; b=vgvy61+OfG4C1TIlt7Iwfh01HHfQCYkKmZ4qHarIMZKlAmjA3/Fvpmbq3KbAULakaX g7HNzjTdtCMG0G3VIZNX+pXGmxKysS3rhBCIOWBREkF8a1ljtdYszA+3LlecY3WmxTC3 V7MINcr1bujv4hzi47TCsffr/RxssCZBh6kcwC5cULFxq0aQVAn59jlXIiZJUpS+RpSG a9mPVrhhE9/G+b/G1PkKkpwFAc6eWWVfT76Qq9yYD2iLEUU9bZ3V958N9a2CLgfq/KcQ TptDEdSWVIdkAK/+nqnAO1UWecmD8BV/NBVprXkbDe+BtJoDWH/9e5Dtu0SpcNjWdlSm ZCaQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVHzIJ4hafWyANrZSTtCSNZPYsCszSuE9TxYjpUFToF3XRLICz2iusn1fJzas0+aqSTiAQxBrllBHwNVPqo90jrbs/MHmEYNmMH4gIY1h/FX5yOxIOeQu+iSMqVB4dsXPmIFAzx/U/VBMgO9X33MmQeNLWszHuKhzb06m2dYg9DNT6GFNQB4JAvq9s3JwTY
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzuZ6zAwfQfjkJKyeG8nNZoi5d1SwPmgSLx+jLmN7SCfKGnGLWu olWPCRH6mqSdjLasumfjhvALFZnbu60zrNIBgEuRhzcT+LZBxtsD
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHOLf7xGwA+hZTOvfJ4c52MkLbOspuvWErast4Zq8cRdDTwXKck74hzIFLHuIE2oa0n1EXQ9g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1110:b0:1fb:4a21:8d44 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1fbb6d2536emr53854065ad.12.1720630315438; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:646:8f81:5980:19b9:a21f:593c:a26]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-1fbb6ad5499sm35853425ad.294.2024.07.10.09.51.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.300.61.1.2\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <15D49ED0-C127-4C72-967A-85A0B76AD74A@akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:51:44 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CEDE6357-88D0-453D-B49D-40BBFA3769B1@gmail.com>
References: <172053058565.655430.14997052769415469050@dt-datatracker-5f88556585-j5r2h> <8D112965-E7A1-4FA3-9A3F-5500CA25A8CE@gmail.com> <C957D0C9-73C4-477C-B6A6-24450A83DD4A@akamai.com> <CAHBU6ivqXD0DP2N9fJZF3KTerk3ZN5n6Qdg+n0Ea0TwGBM3Kjg@mail.gmail.com> <EE616C42-0FA7-40DF-BDF9-F5690E7763A1@gmail.com> <15D49ED0-C127-4C72-967A-85A0B76AD74A@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.300.61.1.2)
Message-ID-Hash: YP6SP4EASDYRPNZNTDHXJKGZMYSL7M25
X-Message-ID-Hash: YP6SP4EASDYRPNZNTDHXJKGZMYSL7M25
X-MailFrom: farinacci@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-secdir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-08
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/QwsZgLpYZJhKzfnjV2R0rYQjXx4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:secdir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secdir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secdir-leave@ietf.org>
Should we just make a statement with a reference. And what reference is best so you will accept the change? Dino > On Jul 10, 2024, at 7:02 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote: > >> One of the reasons I wanted to avoid all this and keep it simple. > > It is not an ASCII world any more. This draft should not move forward. >
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-li… Rich Salz via Datatracker
- [secdir] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Dino Farinacci
- [secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Re: Secdir last call rev… Tim Bray
- [secdir] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Salz, Rich
- [secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Re: Secdir last call rev… Tim Bray
- [secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Re: Secdir last call rev… Salz, Rich
- [secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Dino Farinacci
- [secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Re: Secdir last call rev… Martin J. Dürst
- [secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Salz, Rich
- [secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Dino Farinacci
- [secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Salz, Rich
- [secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Salz, Rich
- [secdir] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Tim Bray