Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-36

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Fri, 02 August 2019 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D66112013B; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 14:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LlvlixKi0umr; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 14:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (outgoing-alum.mit.edu [18.7.68.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 964A8120059; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 14:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MacBook-Pro.localdomain (c-24-62-227-142.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.62.227.142]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x72LqvIW021951 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 2 Aug 2019 17:52:58 -0400
To: Catherine Meadows <catherine.meadows@nrl.navy.mil>, secdir@ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis.all@ietf.org, mmusic@ietf.org
References: <156478165290.20958.13051270492203409535@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <6b29002e-c486-f1e4-dabe-04e6e5fe4428@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 17:52:55 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <156478165290.20958.13051270492203409535@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/R5nLriwBPrZTc8LSJRXqfyh-zhQ>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-36
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 21:53:03 -0000

Catherine,

On 8/2/19 5:34 PM, Catherine Meadows via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Catherine Meadows
> Review result: Ready
> 
>   I generated this review of this document as part
> of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF
> documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written
> with the intent of improving security requirements and considerations
> in IETF drafts.  Comments not addressed in last call may be included
> in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs
> should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> This document updates RFC4566 on the Session Description Protocol, SDP.  The
> Security Considerations Section is well-written and well-thought out, and it
> updates the RFC4566 security considerations when appropriate.  I consider this
> document READY.

Thank you!

	Paul