[secdir] secdir review of draft-adid-urn-01

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Tue, 29 November 2016 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF311293FD; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:59:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qt_SPvPAf6If; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:59:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x231.google.com (mail-ua0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF27F12969E; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:59:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 20so180614880uak.0; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:59:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5DsCNSW9e7Jt5gHQ6nxunSsr5N65jbYWHxcCrb29voE=; b=f2QiHvGHb9fDRrE6G6J9ETGJJtYKay0jeNzzUih74yuN/p8d85J9RAhXXvDh6U5U7n ERo15fQqq4A/atW6LpZkir+X03a45zRIA3EvMWvKTiXNFMqgGZcgrR2oQ/qjveF1gOt6 oQgkiLq+OlfWlv5MM8Ifv1W+yFtysDdH8S1/JutYUhOt2cN/TFbZNr6Fmsd858rK8w0D ksccORYiKcufHzpIDZ3j9rP7gNwCtI6IaMIZ3FJ86mcdnupz51zMx9oLIHxkMHn+C5XS ijbdTa5MqhR3MC/zlRk9lwCdT8dKVvSiPzyotU/FcdACuASbttKW7qdYbPucN0+nWWwj UsmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5DsCNSW9e7Jt5gHQ6nxunSsr5N65jbYWHxcCrb29voE=; b=QzuqkIiah+NxDgJXiw/ygEGOZBb+hLnayDstiJ7oDad2tSxFW0oxUk0+lQwk9Sfsty S9RKvPH6T1Cm/sWrQpiDFg5fYIp2+FxIy55Pel4HdIP55adG+BYer7Odk+g76PYBPa6z RTsWN2sLPxZ7XpfButEwI9AqDGbvsVmFOsBDKJsc8+8vLeGaf1NqMukfWW8E0Bn+nMHO LHkjGzA2dsw6py0q3y6W9BIRxd6Ips8hF98OWFkAXR3XwCaWmWAdhqAKLc5MlFMda7JP wyib8rmx+ArDlOKhzNwOXc9bQ97apybaz+A06Nxaw9ILfSRQNunzyVDNwzLeeHSG+z82 Pukw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00BwatU72d5WlAEFlu3m99DfQcTg3k5/ZEiIbbPj4BoR7qjsn+dzW198byXA8pfsS7qka5LqAAjjC/eWw==
X-Received: by 10.159.33.193 with SMTP id 59mr20189485uac.28.1480431552583; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:59:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.37.66 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:59:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:59:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0c=Qu9s76iUiS5LDqodXYUOBCrDHM2HRedVjHdBoFZXwkQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<iesg@ietf.org>" <iesg@ietf.org>, secdir@ietf.org, draft-adid-urn-01.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/R70M-s6G_57RuADviMLsyWkf6Yg>
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-adid-urn-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:59:16 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

I believe this draft is ready. It's nice to see someone note that
properly checking
for equivalence matters.

Sincerely,
Watson