IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-03.txt

Samuel Weiler <weiler@watson.org> Wed, 11 April 2012 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <weiler@watson.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9D311E80C9; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IFjCOmSrZe84; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7072E11E80C6; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3BJjiW3049459; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:45:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from weiler@watson.org)
Received: from localhost (weiler@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id q3BJjiV5049453; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:45:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from weiler@watson.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: weiler owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:45:44 -0400
From: Samuel Weiler <weiler@watson.org>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F842937.9050305@isode.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204111541590.19341@fledge.watson.org>
References: <4F842937.9050305@isode.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:45:45 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, Teemu Savolainen <teemu.savolainen@nokia.com>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:45:48 -0000

Adding my own comments:

I think there may be a key "con" missing in the discussion of the two 
EDNS0 approaches (in 5.2 in 5.3).  EDNS0 "stuff", whether flags or 
options, are typically hop-by-hop only.  That severely limits the 
applicability of these approaches.

-- Sam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email