Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-usage-07

Andy Bierman <andyb@iwl.com> Thu, 08 July 2010 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <andyb@iwl.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E11A3A6B13 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 10:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yly11+O6L553 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 10:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp152.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp152.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.152]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E623A679F for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 10:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay15.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay15.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E8BA71B40D6; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:12:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by relay15.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: andyb-AT-iwlcorp.com) with ESMTPSA id 765CB1B40F8; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 13:12:10 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C3606C9.3000500@iwl.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:11:37 -0700
From: Andy Bierman <andyb@iwl.com>
Organization: Interworking Labs, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100528 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Yu <tlyu@MIT.EDU>
References: <ldvaaq2lyi4.fsf@cathode-dark-space.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <ldvaaq2lyi4.fsf@cathode-dark-space.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:14:02 -0700
Cc: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-usage.all@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-usage-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: andyb@iwl.com
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:12:08 -0000

On 07/08/2010 09:38 AM, Tom Yu wrote:
> This document provides usage guidelines for the YANG data modeling
> language so that standards track YANG data models will be more
> readable and interoperable.
>
> The Security Considerations section of this document states that it
> does not introduce any new or increased risks to the management
> system.  In fact, the document includes advice for consistently
> communicating those risks in the context of YANG modules.
>
> The Security Considerations section makes reference to a URL
>
>     http://www.ops.ietf.org/yang-security-considerations.txt
>
>   

oops; not sure why the URL in the draft is wrong.
Here is the correct URL:

http://www.ops.ietf.org/netconf/yang-security-considerations.txt

> which had no content when I last visited it, so I was unable to review
> it.
>
> Section 3.4 lists the items whose security risks must be documented in
> a conforming specification.  It omits the requirement, stated in Section
> 4.13, that potentially harmful operations must be mentioned in the
> Security Considerations section of the conforming specification.
> Section 3.4 should probably include the requirement from 4.13.
>
>   

OK -- good catch

> Editorial:
>
> Is the use of "<CODE BEGINS>" in the example in Section 3.1 adequately
> protected from tools that might interpret that string as beginning a
> code component that is never completed?
>   

good point -- I will add a <CODE ENDS> so a tool will not get fooled.
The usage within single quotes should be OK.


Andy