IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-quic-invariants-11

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 28 October 2020 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832C33A0A0B; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OnY89dh3WxX4; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0884A3A0A07; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:c1b6:9abf:94c2:7012] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:c1b6:9abf:94c2:7012]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59E85612910; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:46:42 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1603896402; bh=y+fBVOjFaBGjbvedEDc4LrvjJUGTVH15dE+tGqu2mns=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=GTmDd/yzs2QDME/S+m+QGZwMVof/O/3Z89jbaSYZxmreQLqcahoeIIeO3ryRl9KOb 3jtow/XIOxgcMZJk5xeVT9NosarVscIsnYOvxCVUMXqbnGTdwgK/zloFy8lvGrVovR ZJDyu5VJqHi/wQ+iw7SKXGxbJZpd1qAL8DamZ9UY=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <F79342DA-2463-43E6-8F52-8F7523AA04E0@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7334569E-CB76-46B6-A1AA-DDBD1B1A05AB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:46:41 +0200
In-Reply-To: <160357685316.11679.4088820464581761732@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-quic-invariants.all@ietf.org
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <160357685316.11679.4088820464581761732@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 59E85612910.AFB48
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/SCfYJvh1MlxEBpEK0I1LNOLVpdU>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-quic-invariants-11
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:46:54 -0000

Hi Yoav,

thank you for the review. I've opened a GitHub issue in case the editors would like to discuss editorial changes at https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4305, please feel free to track the resolution there. There is also a tracking milestone at https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/milestone/5.

Thanks,
Lars

> On 2020-10-25, at 1:00, Yoav Nir via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Yoav Nir
> Review result: Ready
> 
> The contents of the "security and privacy considerations" section seems to be
> advice for middlebox authors. I think that it may have been better to name the
> section something else.  However, there is no information that is missing, so I
> don't really have any recommendations for changing things.
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email