[secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-04

Vincent Roca via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 27 January 2023 10:55 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0E3C1522A0; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:55:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vincent Roca via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis.all@ietf.org, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.6.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <167481691829.34833.11060903925888123498@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:55:18 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/SDjexrx8ZovXWKk4ciNLFjvXWpU>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:55:18 -0000

Reviewer: Vincent Roca
Review result: Ready

Hello,

Following my previous review of version -03, it became clear that the context
in which this document has been elaborated is quite different, and that a
secdir review is not necessarily required. I can understand it and therefore
have no further objection.

Cheers,  Vincent