[secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop-02
Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 24 April 2016 15:13 UTC
Return-Path: <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F600128B44; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cLLGCA81P7gZ; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4348D1200A0; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x229.google.com with SMTP id bt5so2118010pac.3; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version; bh=+T5v2358w81YpamyZmgdtAZKCk2JJVo9F1PD1FW1pOI=; b=Eqoxh4p9Wq8ye7HIjnho5l11lzja9ev5/GyTJv8X5BV/7bVhl/nvly59SyPE2rI4fM qxaZJAwSH5lxpHrXCDhS8WurycRX06UWSaPHV8tDxFPczvAnpS1LcBr/i4RR9jJLPZAO +jjnVurj7yxmsBu+/exkDU/CBdWxciyzSpCgyc2C38JTlmdQTylusyL62ObNKcVzqlMh 3n1nqSHZPzXKdP3YgrBxCg2wyPXEsJcLPsYij5iPr0REB8Peq070rzJqDcGXrd+6W/p8 0pxDFsj5uHh+cDHhi2Gok7WPO34JyaqSAYLs/60LFLrBQWWog88fothgUEVAC6MbiLzg g5sg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version; bh=+T5v2358w81YpamyZmgdtAZKCk2JJVo9F1PD1FW1pOI=; b=lxqCbTu8p2jJkPnFkFTjVzhDHsvjT7HocVDned0Fqbe8hRlrLKUFuQ7v5l/cA7cZhl 13ivlgn5emeCUMEgWCHb0ncLmPI4AGYxMvkrgYzP7qgCs9RwBCv9H9AzuN52DfnqhlrV s2820nJwTaxZ/+c9FzMDRrnbMimf30n2sJQFMNw8EQFXtys+quW1Zq39aoFmFqeKUiIV FOGuy2wQlvAIGRmr8UMhDMG7hx985LyJR6Jl9Z/UcXa3cShqb1uHi1EZiYeCjeaqUbvw D1LVp8cOqk4nSuAf2iFYNCQ6JOsCsmBWFvd4f1aa99OJPnTl/wKnoIHQecYWdhDf3axi hAmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXEUhxqgHjnPyCFPWQRfTccVd3ngN76o/aa9IPAe3gYxMATWZiiJV2kjg1k/0/ZLA==
X-Received: by 10.66.123.105 with SMTP id lz9mr42450437pab.37.1461510787809; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Chriss-Air.attlocal.net ([2602:306:838b:1c40:8159:1d42:165:e93e]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id wy7sm22945708pab.5.2016.04.24.08.13.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop.all@ietf.org
From: Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <571CE281.3080308@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:13:05 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020502000001050804000601"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/SDzMbjWBtvv-VADdJ_pSpSpetgY>
Subject: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:13:10 -0000
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Overall this document appears to be ready. The Security Considerations Section points back to the overall security concerns of BGP [RFC4271] as this specification does not add any new parameters. I think this is appropriate. Regards, Chris
- [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-idr-route-os… Chris Lonvick