Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost-05

Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org> Wed, 20 January 2010 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <phoffman@imc.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D724E3A65A6 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:32:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.046
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.046 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aAXcKaVk1Vty for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:32:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (Balder-227.Proper.COM [192.245.12.227]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B1C3A697B for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:32:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o0KKWN7G074896 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:32:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from phoffman@imc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p0624080bc77d18bca7a1@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <201001151516.o0FFG8aO085884@stora.ogud.com>
References: <E18FB588-FA46-447B-828F-BF98527D6725@bbn.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1001141826160.70709@fledge.watson.org> <201001151516.o0FFG8aO085884@stora.ogud.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:32:22 -0800
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>, secdir-secretary@mit.edu, "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
From: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost@tools.ietf.org, dnsext-chairs@tools.ietf.org, secdir <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:32:34 -0000

At 10:16 AM -0500 1/15/10, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
>At 18:43 14/01/2010, Samuel Weiler wrote:
>>Also, the IANA considerations section includes the requirement status column, which implicitly assumes that we are advancing draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-01.  I'm not convinced that's going to happen any time soon, particularly given the lackluster response to draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words, which it depends on.  So... that needs to be tracked.  It's not necessary to cite registry-fixes, but it probably is necessary to treat it as a dependency for publication purposes.
>
>Good point, will talk to AD about this before the document
>goes to the IESG after IETF LC ends.

Will you also bring this to the WG?