[secdir] Secdir review of draft-boucadair-rfc6153-update-01

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 29 August 2013 23:49 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB49F21F9FB7; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.076, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6M0KQ8PLb2hR; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EC621F9F12; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id ep20so954742lab.2 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=GcfpnGLjzuExgqJvWsRWQJJUNMZqgVgH+Ms3VqkVk8o=; b=Jtj/rxiONVQcY07GZJMzV2cuK7vmAGneVcNKryQ97zsBiMI69PTWbAxMp3Pf16VJUk YmO/Cw/rijebTT2X2p3WEGmcVDlrjv3J3Kx+jhWBruwcDym3FCvrbA3VcrRnAWBVmaX9 25GkqAtR42Z/As02JU6Id5lTq13P/g7Tr0sWvo6cfEQf6rjTYru/FPh2SAd8NGJcqbTY eeMRq+hMYVSywFCcSKgfUYrnnR/QSwjTujyOHaSVktylri4+J8HuqZPfUW44Gh+jtMN1 amElD0xxUb3ZM8/xcaYUgYLcyfoC2msSUBe+2TaMIoRdDjrlnR9+J7Wn9yvGVEBBMKHg pCSQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.21.225 with SMTP id y1mr5167848lae.18.1377820166829; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.148.165 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:49:26 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwhrDPGGJ489Df47Q474SL31+n+MwgQbhJxsAwsbrkEexw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-boucadair-rfc6153-update@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158b6bc9bbc9804e51ec15c
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-boucadair-rfc6153-update-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 23:49:29 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

The document describes a fix to the allocation of DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 Options
for Access Network Discovery which appears to be entirely determined by the
needs of backwards compatibility.

I found no security issues problems or comments.

-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/