Re: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-14

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Sun, 04 July 2021 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFD63A1D3B for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 13:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l7B7DcTy9WU8 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 13:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63BE23A1D42 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 13:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 164KWgoJ025008 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 4 Jul 2021 16:32:47 -0400
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 13:32:42 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210704203242.GF17170@mit.edu>
References: <162500581702.14479.10740784349692238870@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <162500581702.14479.10740784349692238870@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/SvH-MBqwEnfi9Tv-D0slq1_sNZ4>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-14
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 20:32:55 -0000

Thanks, Chris -- it's reassuring to have another set of eyes on the
changes.

-Ben

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 03:30:17PM -0700, Chris Lonvick via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Chris Lonvick
> Review result: Ready
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
>  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
> last call comments.
> 
> The summary of the review is READY.
> 
> This is a re-review. The Security Considerations section has been updated and
> addresses the issues I noted from the version -09 I previously reviewed. The
> additions to the section do a very good job of addressing the adherence to or
> differences from the security considerations sections of the referenced RFCs.
> 
> Regards,
> Chris
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview