Re: [secdir] review of draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-06

[Klaas Wierenga <[e-mail]>]

Hi Job,

Yes it does (and apologies for not spotting the 07 version). 

Klaas


On 21 April 2017 at 10:05:43, Job Snijders ([e-mail]) wrote:

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:57:38AM +0200, Klaas Wierenga wrote:  
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's  
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the  
> IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the  
> security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat  
> these comments just like any other last call comments.   
>  
> This document presents examples of how operators may use BGP large  
> communities to support some typical use-cases.  
>  
> In general the document is well written and I have no major issues,  
> and I consider it: ready with nits (see below)  
>  
> My one nit is that even though I think that the statement in the security considerations "Operators should note the recommendations in Section 11(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-06#section-11) of BGP  
> Operations and Security  
> [RFC7454(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7454)]” is largely true, it  
> would be useful if the authors would expand a little on that, not  
> being an expert in this field, I am wondering if the use-cases you  
> describe in one way or the other influence the RFC7454 considerations.  

In -07 - following the GenART review we expanded the security section,  
does that address your nit?  

https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-07.txt  

Kind regards,  

Job