[secdir] Secdir review of draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-04

Magnus Nyström <magnusn@gmail.com> Fri, 27 January 2017 03:41 UTC

Return-Path: <magnusn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0554312940E for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:41:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id crdCElxcZ2BR for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:41:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C83871289B0 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:41:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id v200so8079869ywc.3; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:41:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ScEau7bo8mvoBhxv5Vhz4w2yf6yye9MrLGFvsIkTtyM=; b=k7BRTQmhBYtGJKNp1zajP/OsALspAkGp0ebi2h0JpBOLtXM1xk4Mcum0C98YYZqh5L duHcgCBr7A52Ile6II9wKKV10CYv0ldfpo6b7SHLiLOE89NKPz++7gPV1xR3LQ3fxMqb J9pO+A9PVkHkkSIxoc7zZgiaGSqdLSQTfWFx8jarVlvZL0ubd7rhOn5/omigwg/ZQQWm HOc9de5YVTtEwFZcCcudIXf56PPZDee1s/bHijgmYerWHrnI7ERJWm6jlEeHG5quQ544 4NGs4b0irZscH8HDuTYC8dUG38Pv4hgpFg3gbnvtZNi5yHeqr4T3kEaLg3Q1p8xnf9Yv SiPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ScEau7bo8mvoBhxv5Vhz4w2yf6yye9MrLGFvsIkTtyM=; b=NuvU1kEV58xh3GKv3t22GUAeOqtJjapl4AHOwx0h7Yf64C3Ba0gYCoahSfJTt3cv6q ZX2DwKKECPps/2eYEJY1vJwKYSQxEjBopr5KOYxjnUZkzT1tGTBJIsrzr8ctpGl8hV5p +apLw9EnzypmdbOeWTZ6NCTLzfIFL3TBAewGTEoHJgafW1AJcXgi1g8dtQpwLOi/pIEF YY5H5j+/sPsMwoCZLtNlldCpDMd4XL974C1Ix5hWmW7vNHY6VzFvf67VT176X4SYoNRB hLMaemyazFE9PPtkV2mA88aPc1OZ8CBkQIQBbjZbECcmdAIls/wX8tf5ebh7D1N3Fowv HyiQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKjuIFaE0DWxJbuqRLdkNQWzIXvsMctlQP6kFbpurW01NtYlgyLSFqCH5994xTck9kASeWyYnQiuXMPjw==
X-Received: by 10.129.175.5 with SMTP id n5mr4838831ywh.209.1485488508925; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:41:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.195.1 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:41:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Magnus Nyström <magnusn@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:41:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CADajj4ZAE_LnB_i_=6Dh2dVUGHEQguqn2n_awmTZaKAGjeupnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-04@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/TkwCZqx0UCKRBU6yVAKfUqzKUvQ>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:41:51 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document constitutes a request for the Assigned Numbers Authority
(ANA) to allocate an
IEEE Std 802.15.4 Information Element number for an IETF Information
Element, and describes how the IETF Information Element is formatted.

I have no concerns with this document.
-- Magnus