[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-12

Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com> Sun, 19 August 2018 17:59 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153470157533.21344.975291793985145087@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 10:59:35 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/UR89OiOxJgCAXY2zdz88n3saHkY>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-12

Reviewer: Stefan Santesson
Review result: Has Nits

In agreement with nit comments in the Gen-Art review.

1) Section 2. Background seems to be a duplication with the introduction
section and could probably be merged with this section.

2) In general I wander wether the requirement level "SHOULD" is to week in some
places. The concern (and question) here is whether this may lead to uncertainty
whether a Split-DNS configuration always will provide the expected level of
security (or fail), or wether such configuration may lead to successful
communication without the expected level of security ( in compliance with this
specification).

[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ip… Stefan Santesson
Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Paul Wouters