Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 12 March 2013 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7787E21F8A2A for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Ra2-hVL+FX6 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB2621F8A0B for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [130.129.16.118]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B92B22060; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:48:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sandelman.ca (quigon.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5D6CA0CB; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:48:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Tsao, Tzeta" <Tzeta.Tsao@cooperindustries.com>
In-reply-to: <85A23E0910B2FB4B8EF60D0888CB083602658653@EVS2.nam.ci.root>
References: <85A23E0910B2FB4B8EF60D0888CB083602658653@EVS2.nam.ci.root>
Comments: In-reply-to "Tsao, Tzeta" <Tzeta.Tsao@cooperindustries.com> message dated "Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:14:02 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:48:02 -0400
Message-ID: <11981.1363110482@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: angel.lozano@upf.edu, vanesa.daza@upf.edu, secdir@ietf.org, jpv@cisco.com, "Alexander, Roger" <Roger.Alexander@cooperindustries.com>, mischa.dohler@cttc.es, adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:48:14 -0000

>>>>> "Tsao," == Tsao, Tzeta <Tzeta.Tsao@cooperindustries.com> writes:
    Tsao> juncture, because of the reorientation of the focus of the draft, it
    Tsao> would seem better to wait out for more input from the WG before starting
    Tsao> to consider how to best address the questions raised in your
    Tsao> comments. 

If the WG is going to be able to provide you with more input, then we
need to take the comments and structure them into a series of
discussions.  
The easiest way to do this is to turn them into issues in the tracker. 

Again, would you like me to do this, or would you prefer to do this
yourself?

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works 
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/