[secdir] Secdir review of draft-housley-implementer-obligations-02

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Thu, 23 July 2015 11:02 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7729F1A3B9C; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 04:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CJv1_IvCYesK; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 04:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.acr.fi [83.145.195.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57A761A701A; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 04:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fireball.acr.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.15.1/8.14.8) with ESMTPS id t6NB22Sc005263 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:02:02 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.acr.fi (8.15.1/8.14.8/Submit) id t6NB22of004965; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:02:02 +0300 (EEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <21936.51625.952477.450949@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:02:01 +0300
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, draft-housley-implementer-obligations.all@tools.ietf.org
X-Edit-Time: 4 min
X-Total-Time: 3 min
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/UrAVvyo7bl_W-6nkaS-Qgji05DM>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-housley-implementer-obligations-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:02:05 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document describes the exceptations of implementers of IETF
protocols, and security consideration section properly points out that
following specifications might not be enough, maintenance is also
needed to fix issues found later. It also provides nice example why
security processing is exception to Postel's Law:

    For example, a password that is close, but not exactly right, is
    not sufficient to gain access.

I think this document is ready.
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi