Re: [secdir] review of draft-crocker-id-adoption-05

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Fri, 17 January 2014 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403081AE169; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:08:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ok5mva_8ecnf; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:08:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E0B1ADFA9; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:08:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s0HG8PTa025324 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:08:30 -0800
Message-ID: <52D9556F.6090704@bbiw.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:08:15 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng)" <kwiereng@cisco.com>
References: <8D28F665-CDF8-4FAA-869E-CA5EF6E673D2@cisco.com> <52D950F9.7050909@bbiw.net> <C9AFAB87-CE3F-46C5-A603-10B1394DDB6D@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C9AFAB87-CE3F-46C5-A603-10B1394DDB6D@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.67]); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:08:30 -0800 (PST)
Cc: "draft-crocker-id-adoption.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-crocker-id-adoption.all@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] review of draft-crocker-id-adoption-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:08:45 -0000

On 1/17/2014 8:07 AM, Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng) wrote:
> Ehm, yes I understand what you are saying. But I think the AD has a formal role in approving a recharter, right?


charter concerns are handled by the bullet that refers to charter scope.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net