Re: [secdir] review of draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-07

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Mon, 25 February 2013 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3ED21E8042 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:53:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.722
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.722 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.876, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WxbynmTQspB9 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:53:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1E021F934C for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:53:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=424; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1361818396; x=1363027996; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=zojgP045hu5luGRUarwrjYBPL4tgjwdxhlTne1Vtq6k=; b=kjSDLeBH3iwgEMjbtW9Fh4GUYFSFukfobHi5PrRLCV4pMCcSwt9+lDbt qQ9CVJGk2QC9OrCNVadR+mUYi/c3t3CWf6feZikw6T73D64xNPFRtnjva 56ncUgAq7Z4W+hITMoxGvRRbesU6VEf9X8QAoAw05y82Wj6Y0PAkkis1U Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAHCyK1GtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABFhghHuwgNeBZzgh8BAQEDATRFBQsCAQgcKAICMCUCBA4FiA0GkjqafQiSJYEfjTwzBwSCJTZhA5Y9kGWDBw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,736,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="180736795"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2013 18:53:05 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1PIr5tF025364 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:53:05 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.112]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:53:04 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Thread-Topic: review of draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-07
Thread-Index: AQHOE1WD9Huc28oz3UyHumQn5MMuMJiLOPgA//+zC2g=
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:53:03 +0000
Message-ID: <8AFC46FD-88D7-40AB-AE67-FE836DB6F109@cisco.com>
References: <512B5C07.4070602@bbn.com>, <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074749F0B9@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074749F0B9@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<brian@innovationslab.net>" <brian@innovationslab.net>, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, secdir <secdir@ietf.org>, =?gb2312?B?U2VhbiBTaGVuIMnyy7g=?= <shenshuo@cnnic.cn>, "<rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>" <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>, "<john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>" <john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>, "<jiangsheng@huawei.com>" <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [secdir] review of draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:53:18 -0000

Yes, as Ted indicated, very thorough. Thanks. 

- Bernie

On Feb 25, 2013, at 12:28 PM, "Ted Lemon" <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> Wow, thanks very much for the thorough review!   I will defer to the authors on what to do next, but just wanted to express my appreciation for your thoroughness!
>