[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11

zhangdacheng <dacheng.zhang@huawei.com> Wed, 31 January 2018 11:55 UTC

Return-Path: <dacheng.zhang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C27C12E051 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 03:55:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.231
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.231 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id to9rHi3tBXdj for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 03:55:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B149412D82C for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 03:55:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LHREML710-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 62064AABD4710 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:55:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMI403-HUB.china.huawei.com ( by LHREML710-CAH.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:55:21 +0000
Received: from DGGEMI501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([]) by dggemi403-hub.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 19:55:14 +0800
From: zhangdacheng <dacheng.zhang@huawei.com>
To: secdir <secdir@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process.all@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Secdir review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11
Thread-Index: AdOaidiwmNb+jvbkRYeCaN7ErZDdvw==
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:55:14 +0000
Message-ID: <879E76B64CF340468BF5E4DE504C2242016A132F@dggemi501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/V5MqbgrD147NIjDv6i3NCfyOtHY>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-11
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:55:55 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document details the IETF's Meeting Venue Selection Process from the perspective of the community's goals, criteria and thought processes. It points to additional process documents on the IAOC Web Site that go into further detail and are subject to change with experience. This note proposes no protocols, and therefore no new protocol insecurities.

So, no additional comments.