IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 19 December 2016 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787271295A7; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:28:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CnubzDw1Tage; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:28:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31E1D12959C; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:28:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mbp-4.local ([IPv6:2601:1c0:cb00:5d1a:4444:8643:6836:dce8]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uBJISuIs058902 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 19 Dec 2016 18:28:56 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: nagasaki.bogus.com: Host [IPv6:2601:1c0:cb00:5d1a:4444:8643:6836:dce8] claimed to be mbp-4.local
To: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-large-community.all@ietf.org
References: <27F009E7-E8C2-4235-8288-DC8637FCF370@inria.fr>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-ID: <058a97b7-3588-948b-eb6f-da2745830a06@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:28:55 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/50.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <27F009E7-E8C2-4235-8288-DC8637FCF370@inria.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V7stmoJiIdHW7BKxxQADdnuk2VaW9lBCl"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/V8vB2P6TuvaALDVTiSW05XORYOg>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 18:28:58 -0000

Thanks

joel

On 12/19/16 10:14 AM, Vincent Roca wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> IMHO, the document is Ready.
>
> This document specifies an extension to BGP Communities.
> The initial RFC1997 being a bit old, it does not include any security discussion section.
> Therefore it is important that the present document has a detailed discussion on the
> topic, which is actually the case. The level of details seems appropriate.
> Furthermore there is a dedicated "Error handling" section which is also fine.
>
> Cheers,
>
>    Vincent
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email